Building a Shared Vision: Developing and Sustaining Media Education Partnerships in the Middle East

This article explores how media education partnerships will help institutions in the MENA and the U.S. provide culturally-appropriate education to their students, and the positive impact of each partnerships’ faculty and students being exposed to media, journalism and communication students and practitioners from other cultures and nations.

mediaimage
Often the most fleeting contact with international visitors can have a far-reaching and unforeseen impact. Drawing from the authors’ media teaching,Building a Shared Vision: Developing and Sustaining Media Education Partnerships in the Middle East Articles research, and practice in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), the article addresses the inspiring and enriching cultural impact of media education partnerships between the U.S. and the MENA. The article outlines keys to creating and sustaining successful media, journalism and communication university partnerships, reporting specifically on an international media education collaboration in progress between l’Institut de Presse et des Sciences de l’Information (IPSI), University of Manouba, Tunis and Bowling Green State University. The article also explores how media education partnerships will help institutions in the MENA and the U.S. provide culturally-appropriate education to their students, and the positive impact of each partnerships’ faculty and students being exposed to media, journalism and communication students and practitioners from other cultures and nations. It gives evidence as to how media education partnerships can not only develop professional standards in media, but also build capacity to strengthen democratic practices, build civil society, increase critical thinking and awareness, minimize and manage conflicts, fight negative stereotypes that often emerge as a reaction to governmental and corporate media discourses.

An increased attention to the growth of civil society in the Middle East and North Africa (see, for instance, Amin & Gher, 2000; Bellin, 1995; Borowiec, 1998; Brand, 1998; Darwish, 2003) reveals that civic discourse functions best where there is free access to information and where unhindered discussions allow citizens to examine all sides of civic issues. Because information and communication technology (ICT), media, and journalism are some of the most important sites for civic debate, they are essential partners in any nation’s efforts towards enhancing civil society. As nations in the Middle East and North Africa MENA continue to enhance civil society, it is imperative that their journalists and media and communication professionals have the professional training and dedication to maintain the highest codes of conduct and practice that will make them integral components in the process of building civil society.

At present, however, media critics have shown that the professional activity of journalists in MENA countries is still very vulnerable (Amin, 2002, p. 125). As an expected consequence, MENA education programs in the communication discipline, most notably in news media, journalism, telecommunications and media technologies, have tended to support powerful institutions and individuals, rather than civic discourse and the voices of students as citizens (Amin, 2002; Rugh, 2004; Lowstedt, 2004). For example, investigation on media systems in eighteen nations in the MENA (Rugh, 2004) revealed that radio and television in all these countries, excepting Lebanon, are still subordinated to powerful institutions. There have been several recent international summits acknowledging these concerns. For example, the 2004 conference of the Institute of Professional Journalists in Beirut on “Media Ethics and Journalism in the Arab World: Theory, Practice and Challenges Ahead”, had as one of its main themes the pressures on Arab media and journalists from local governments and other powerful players inside the Arab world. During the Arab International Media Forum held at Doha, in March 2005, workshop discussions underlined that the Arab media’s independence have yet to be established within countries where the media have been strictly controlled. And, perhaps the most important summit thus far this millennium, the United Nations World Summit on the Information Society (UN WSIS), held in Tunis, November 2005, addressed the immense challenges of the digital divide and other concerns in the MENA.

Investigating educational partnerships in the MENA

As evidenced by summits on Arab, MENA and related global media, there is an emergent body of research on MENA media (see, for instance, Amin, 2002; Cassara & Lengel, 2004; Darwish, 2003; George & Souvitz, 2003; Lowstedt, 2004) and of research on the potential for media technologies generally and, specifically, in efforts to democratize the region (see for instance, Alterman, 1998; Dunn, 2000; Hamada, 2003; Isis International, 2003; Lengel, 2002a; Lengel, 2002b; Lengel, 2004; Lengel, Ben Hamza, Cassara, & El Bour, 2005). However, there is very little research focusing on the benefits and challenges of media education partnerships between nations in the MENA and those outside it. A broad-scale evaluation of the current situation of MENA media education is needed to fully assess the financial, pedagogical and attitudinal constraints found across the region. Additionally, what is needed is an exploration of how cooperation and collaboration, partnerships between the MENA and other regions to develop educational partnerships which can enhance media education in the region, through shared online resources, shared experience, mutual commitment to MENA media students’ academic and professional development, and positive interaction between those within and outside the region.

This article addresses such research needs by investigating the potential for partnerships in the MENA. It presents key components for creating and sustaining successful university partnerships in media, journalism, and communication. It also explores how media education partnerships can help universities within and outside the MENA to provide culturally-appropriate education and training to their media, journalism, telecommunications, new media, and communication students, develop innovative online and distance learning initiatives, cultivate a community of practice, and foster a positive impact of each partnerships’ faculty and students being exposed to those media instructors, researchers, students, and practitioners from other cultures and nations. The article reports specifically on a media partnership in progress between l’Institut de Presse et des Sciences de l’Information (IPSI) at the University of Manouba in Tunis, Tunisia and Bowling Green State University in Bowling Green, Ohio, USA. It focuses on the experiences of the faculty co-directing the partnership in media, journalism and international communication, particularly the process of developing and sustaining the partnership. The article reflects on the future vision of media education in the MENA, particularly the challenges and the future of investment in the media education by governments, educational institutions, and civil society and media organizations within and outside the region. Finally, it analyzes how media education partnerships can not only develop professional standards in media, but also build capacity to strengthen democratic practices, build civil society, increase critical thinking and awareness, minimize and manage conflicts, fight negative stereotypes that emerge as a result of the often inattentive, insensitive and inaccurate nature of governmental and corporate media discourses.

Partnerships and civil society building

Citizens, scholars, practitioners and civil society organizations argue much needs to be done to democratize media, journalism and unrestricted access to information and communication technology in the MENA (see Camau & Geisser, 2003; Cassara & Lengel, 2004; Chouikha, 2002; Newsom & Lengel, 2003; Tetreault, 2000). An important place to begin this transformation is to foster educational collaboration within and outside the MENA that recognizes the role that a free and independent media plays in transition to building democracy and which understands that journalists can serve as models of participants in democratic processes.

As MENA nations engage in building civil society, it will be critical that journalists in the region have not only the skills they need to do their work well, but also the insights necessary to negotiate the challenges posed by democratization. These insights are enhanced by international exchange. The ever-growing presence of information and communication technology (ICT) and the additional resources and challenges that ICT offers journalists and citizens alike create even more opportunities for democratic dialogue and international exchange (Eickelman & Anderson, 1999).

Because democratic dialogue is a hallmark of civil societies, exchange and dialogue between two international partners is at the heart of the international collaborative program “Capacity Building for a Democratic Press: A Sustainable Partnership to Develop Media and Journalism Curricula in Tunisia.” The program, which was launched in 2004 with a two-year funding commitment from the Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI),1 highlights a hands-on practicum approach in which l’Institut de Presse et des Sciences de l’Information, University of Manouba, Tunis students benefit from practical professional journalism skills through internships with U.S. and MENA media organizations and engage in interactive and practical training in media and journalistic production and practice. This media educational partnership is creating sustainable core curriculum additions at the Tunisian partnership university including new program specializations in Women, Media and Democracy, as well as in Journalism and Human Rights. It is important to note that IPSI is the only press institute or program of study in Tunisia and, arguably, the only one in North Africa.

The partnership combines in-person and online contact between IPSI and BGSU faculty and the students with the cultural knowledge and both traditional university learning environments on the two campuses, and online through Blackboard, the BGSU online course delivery program. The project serves both undergraduate and graduate students at both partnership universities, enhances faculty instruction and online and face-to-face curriculum development, and creates sustainable and wide-reaching partnerships between academic institutions, civil society and NGOs, the private sector, and policy makers.

Developing a community of practice: Keys to successful media education partnerships

The most successful partnerships cooperate and collaborate as a community of practice. What brings members of a community of practice together is a shared vision and goals, and a passion for mutual dialogue (Preston & Lengel, 2004). Respect for human worth and dignity, individual voices, and wrestling with complex social issues are characteristics of democratic environments (Kubow & Fossum, 2003; Kubow & Kinney, 2000; Kubow, 1999).

Communities of practice are emerging as important bases for creating, sharing, and applying knowledge. These communities share ideas and innovations, collaborating across traditional hierarchical structures and geophysical boundaries. Part of the mission of the partnership discussed in this article is to maintain a sustainable community of practice in the area of media, journalism, communication and ICT. In this partnership a diverse and committed group of media, journalism, communication technology, comparative/international education and democratic education researchers, teachers, practitioners and students are engaging in the examination and creation of democratic media and online civic discourse. Through face-to-face meetings, online learning, several workshops in both the US and Tunisia, and participation in and reporting on the UN World Summit on the Information Society, the community of practice supports the concepts surrounding the development of a free and independent media and will internationalize and professionalize media institutions in the U.S. and Tunisia, and, more broadly across the MENA.

The partnership transcends traditional university course work and practice to become an actual community, sustainable beyond the 24-month schedule of grant-supported activities. Because of the commitment of the participating institutions, the community will sustain and grow through further curriculum development, research and related activities involving additional partners throughout the MENA. This will occur mainly due to the transformative nature of the interaction. Personal, direct contact with citizens from other culture and nations can break down stereotypical imagery and ideas, which often emerge the result of government and mainstream, corporate media discourses. The direct interaction, intensive collaboration and co-learning, and respectful dialogue of partnerships can create a level of compassionate interaction between the partnership participants who create the community of practice.

1) Commitment of institutions involved in the media partnership

Communities of practice cannot be created or sustained without commitment. Outlined hereafter are six keys to creating and sustaining successful online university education and training partnerships: 1) Commitment of partnership institutions; 2) Commitment and expertise of personnel; 3) Commitment to providing access to ICT and other facilities and resources to students and faculty at both partner institutions; 4) Commitment to engaging with professional media, journalism and civil society organizations; 5) Commitment to program development and enhancement; and 6) Commitment to sustainability.

First and foremost, partnerships can only be created and sustained if there is commitment on the parts of both participating institutions. In the case of the partnership described in this paper, several strong reasons attest to the importance of choice of university in a collaborative partnership. First, the Institut de Presse et des Sciences de l’Information (IPSI) at the University of Manouba, Tunisia is the only media and journalism university institute in the nation (MERST, 2002). Second, faculty and administration at IPSI are committed to the partnership at all levels. They have welcomed both face-to-face (F2F) and online participation between students and faculty and between students and students at both universities. Institutional commitment has also resulted in internal and external support for the program. While the Middle East Partnership Initiative, a U.S. State Department program, as provided a highly competitive grant of $100,000 US (See Appendix 2) A significant cost-share (220%, or $220,000) in support of the partnership program has been provided primarily by BGSU, with additional support from civil society and private sector partners. In adherence to the university’s commitment to international education and exchange, several BGSU units have articulated their support of the program. The University Provost, the Executive Vice President, and Deans of three different Colleges have expressed their commitment.

2) Commitment and expertise of personnel

Along with commitment at the institutional level, primarily by directors and key leadership of each institution, a second key to successful partnerships is the commitment and expertise of the faculty who will develop, implement, and sustain the partnership program. The IPSI-BGSU partnership, for example, emerged from the long-standing relationships originally developed by U.S. Partnership Co-Director when she was a Fulbright Researcher in women and media in Tunisia, 1993-1994.2 Ten years after her first in-country work in Tunisia, issues surrounding media, democracy and the information society remain a challenge for that nation and elsewhere in the MENA. Thus, the rationale for the partnership is that there is a great deal of mutual benefit of international educational exchange, of opportunities to learn first-hand about diverse practices in media and journalism from both partner institutions’ faculty and students, and to work together toward enhancing civil society in the MENA and abroad.

The partnership team members are widely published and nationally and internationally recognized. The partnership co-directors, coordinators and key administrators have each directed or co-directed international educational programs in China, Croatia, France, Great Britain, Austria, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the MENA. Finally, partnership co-directors’ expertise in women and the media, particularly in the MENA (see Azouz, 2005; Azouz, 1994; Lengel, 1998; Lengel, 2000; Lengel, 2002; Newsom & Lengel, 2003) was crucial to the success of the “Women, Media and Democracy” workshop, detailed below.

3. Commitment to providing access to resources

A third key to successful partnerships is the commitment to providing access to ICT and other facilities and resources to students and faculty at both partner institutions. IPSI students are exposed to the digital audiovisual equipment and the strong web development curriculum and tools available at the Institute. Of particular importance to the partnership, ISPI students have access to 150 computers with Internet access, which affords the opportunity to engage in the distance education component of the program with the U.S. Partner institution. BGSU faculty and students are benefitting by learning from the extensive international teaching, research, and media and journalism production experience of the IPSI faculty and administration. Also, there are several key strengths of the U.S. Partner for the MEPI exchange. The first strength is the cutting-edge journalism, multimedia, computing and production facilities housed in the BGSU School of Communication Studies, which houses the Departments of Journalism, Interpersonal Communication and Telecommunications. Further, as an Internet 2 campus, Bowling Green State University has an advanced technological infrastructure that fully supports all of the online and telecommunications activities cited within the programs of this grant. BGSU’s IDEAL unit (Interactive Distance Education for All Learners) oversees the development and implementation of distance (i.e., web-based) course work and communication on campus. Additionally, the University is part of the larger OhioLink library system, which allows MENA faculty and students participating in the partnership to access materials and holdings at all of the state universities and many of many of the private colleges and universities in Ohio, and also provides links to that other U.S. library systems. Finally, additional technology services are being provided by WBGU-TV PBS and the US Embassy in Tunis which are both providing digital videoconferencing services for the quarterly meetings between the two universities.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Building a Shared Vision: Developing and Sustaining Media Education Partnerships in the Middle East

What is the environmental impact of NFTs?

Crypto and NFts are future of finance and wealth management. So let’s learn how NFT can impact the world environment while providing greatest technology revolution.

mediaimage
Like cryptocurrencies,What is the environmental impact of NFTs? Articles NFTs have disrupted the world as we know it. Now instead of the Mona Lisa, collectors are clamoring over the works of Beeple, 3LAU, and José Delbo.

But unlike physical works of art, NFTs are treated differently.

How do you store NFTs?
Like cryptocurrencies, you can store NFTs on specialized digital wallets. In fact, some of the best Tezro NFT wallet apps have built-in support for mainstream cryptocurrencies. So that way, you can access both your crypto and non-fungible tokens on a single platform.

But do keep in mind that security is a major issue for digital assets. As cryptocurrencies and NFTs have become extremely popular, hackers and cybercriminals have taken to hacking into NFT/crypto wallets and stealing their contents. Despite the various steps taken by wallet providers, hackers are becoming increasingly sophisticated.

It is because of this that I highly recommend that you make use of both hot and cold wallets. A cold wallet is a hardware-based storage device like a pen drive or hard disk that stores digital assets offline. And this makes it next-to-impossible for a hacker to gain access to your crypto tokens or NFTs.

What are NFTs?
An NFT or non-fungible token is a piece of media that has been tokenized on a blockchain such as the Ethereum network. Besides Ethereum, Solana, WAX, Tezos, and Flow are other popular blockchains for NFTs. But as Ethereum is the most established, it currently remains the network of choice for most.

What is the environmental impact of NFTs?
From a technical standpoint, NFTs do not actually have any impact on the environment. Instead, it is the method in which these assets are produced which have raised a few eyebrows. This is because NFTs require immense quantities of computer processing power to validate transactions. And in turn, this leads to a huge consumption of electric power.

Let’s now take a look at the overall environmental impact that NFT trading has on the environment:

Higher carbon emissions
An overall increase in global temperature caused by global warming
Rising fossil fuel consumption to generate energy for NFT and crypto mining
So naturally, you’re probably asking the question, are there any environmentally friendly NFTs that require less energy. Fortunately, the answer is a resounding yes. The popularity of NFTs has encouraged enthusiasts around the world to switch to greener alternatives.

This is why NFTs minted on the Solana and Tezos blockchains have become increasingly popular. As these blockchains use a PoS consensus mechanism to validate transactions, they require significantly less processing power. Let’s take a look now at some green alternative NFT blockchains.

Green NFT Blockchains You Can Consider
Here’s my selection of the top 3 best environmentally sustainable blockchains:

1. Solana
A popular alternative to Ethereum-powered cryptocurrencies, Solana has been widely praised for the speed in which it processes transactions. And all for minimal gas fees unlike those often charged on the Ethereum network. Because of this Solana is sometimes called the “Ethereum killer” by some. And as an added plus, its NFTs are supported by most NFT wallet apps.

More importantly, because Solana uses significantly less energy then Ethereum to process transactions, the blockchain has a much smaller carbon footprint. This is thanks to its PoS consensus mechanism that keeps things moving quickly. So, it should come as no surprise to see that Solana is regarded as the second most popular NFT blockchain available.

2. Tezos
Another top contender for the NFT hot spot is Tezos. It utilizes the same PoS consensus mechanism as Solana to validate transactions. Besides that, the blockchain has an active community behind it who appreciate the network’s long-term upgradability.

One of the reasons why Tezos is a top choice is because it’s energy-efficient, security focused, and scalable. Meaning that it is environmentally-friendly, safe to use, and won’t slow down the more users it receives. All of which makes for a seriously solid NFT blockchain.

3. Flow
Considered by some to be a successor to Ethereum, Flow was built with scalability in mind. So it should come as no surprise to see that the network is energy-efficient, scalable to size, and highly secure. In fact, studies show that minting an NFT on flow uses less energy than performing a Google search.

Another thing you would do well to note is that Flow has partnered with reputable names such as NBA to mint custom NFTs. All of which goes to show the potential this blockchain network has. And to top it off, Flow NFTs can be stored on the best NFT wallets.

Closing Thoughts
NFTs are likely to be the future of art and collectibles as we become increasingly digitalised. But the onus is now on developers and enthusiasts to seek out more environmentally-friendly solutions. And one way of doing so is minting NFTs on blockchain networks that are sustainable.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on What is the environmental impact of NFTs?

Understanding CoreDAO: An In-Depth Analysis of Tokenomics, Ecosystem Features

CoreDAO is a decentralized autonomous organization built on the Ethereum blockchain. It aims to create a sustainable and community-driven ecosystem for the cryptocurrency market. In this article, we will provide an in-depth analysis of CoreDAO’s tokenomics, ecosystem features, and the benefits of investing in its native token, CORE.

mediaimage
CoreDAO is a decentralized autonomous organization built on the Ethereum blockchain. It aims to create a sustainable and community-driven ecosystem for the cryptocurrency market. In this article,Understanding CoreDAO: An In-Depth Analysis of Tokenomics, Ecosystem Features Articles we will provide an in-depth analysis of CoreDAO’s tokenomics, ecosystem features, and the benefits of investing in its native token, CORE.

Tokenomics of CoreDAO
The CORE token is the native cryptocurrency of the CoreDAO ecosystem. It was launched in August 2021 and is based on the ERC-20 standard. The token is used to facilitate transactions and payments within the ecosystem, as well as for governance and voting rights. The total supply of CORE is capped at 10 million tokens, with a circulating supply of around 1.5 million tokens as of February 2023.

The tokenomics of CoreDAO are designed to ensure a fair and equitable distribution of tokens among the community members. The initial token distribution was done through a community-driven distribution model. Users could earn tickets by participating in community activities like staking, providing liquidity, and participating in governance decisions.

The CoreDAO team has also implemented a token-burning mechanism to reduce the total supply of CORE over time. When a user uses CORE to pay transaction fees or participate in governance decisions, a portion of the token is burned, which reduces the total supply of CORE in circulation.

39.995% is allocated to node mining to reward miners and other participants for securing the network, with node rewards distributed over an 81-year period.

25.029% of the budget is set aside for community airdrops.

15% is set aside to reward past, present, and future core contributors.

10% is set aside as a reserve to be used later.

DAO receives 9.5% of the funds needed to build the ecosystem.

0.476% is allocated as relayer rewards, and relayers, like nodes, must be compensated for the services they provide to the chain’s security.

After Bitcoin block rewards cease in 2040, the Core DAO network will most likely provide additional rewards for Bitcoin miners. The block rewards will be 3.6% lower each year than the previous year.

Ecosystem Features of CoreDAO
CoreDAO’s ecosystem includes a decentralized exchange (DEX), a liquidity pool, and a governance system. The DEX allows users to trade cryptocurrencies with low transaction fees and minimal slippage. The liquidity pool enables users to provide liquidity and earn rewards in return. The governance system allows users to participate in decision-making and propose changes to the ecosystem.

The CoreDAO ecosystem is powered by smart contracts that are audited by reputable third-party firms to ensure security and transparency. The ecosystem also leverages AI-powered trading tools like Wilbur to improve cryptocurrency trading and provide users with accurate and up-to-date information.

The decentralized exchange of CoreDAO, CoreDEX, is designed to provide users with a seamless and user-friendly trading experience. The DEX has a simple and intuitive user interface that allows users to easily trade cryptocurrencies. The DEX also has low transaction fees and minimal slippage, which ensures that users get the best possible price when trading cryptocurrencies.

The liquidity pool of CoreDAO, CoreLiquidity, is designed to provide users with a simple and effective way to earn rewards for providing liquidity. The liquidity pool has a low entry barrier, which means that users can start providing liquidity with a small amount of cryptocurrency. The liquidity pool also has low fees, which ensures that users get the best possible return on their investment.

The governance system of CoreDAO, CoreGovernance, is designed to ensure that the community has a say in the decision-making process. The governance system allows users to propose changes to the ecosystem and vote on proposals. The governance system is also designed to be fair and transparent, ensuring all community members have an equal say in the decision-making process.

Benefits of Investing in CORE
Investing in CORE can provide several benefits to investors. First, CORE holders have governance and voting rights, which allows them to participate in decision-making and propose changes to the ecosystem. Second, holding CORE can provide users with access to exclusive features and rewards within the ecosystem. For example, CORE holders can earn discounts on transaction fees and earn higher rewards in the liquidity pool.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Understanding CoreDAO: An In-Depth Analysis of Tokenomics, Ecosystem Features